1. Home
  2. Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
  3. Gani Dharma

Paradoxical leadership and organizational support in the new normal era: An experimental vignette study virtual team collective efficacy

  • Abstract Views: 140
  • PDF Downloads: 0
  • July 12, 2023
  • Gani Dharma Universitas Indonesia,  Indonesia
  • Endang Parahyanti Universitas Indonesia,  Indonesia
Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/00637za0002

Keywords:

Paradoxical Leadership Behavior; Perceived Organizational Support; virtual team collective efficacy

Abstract

Implementation of Working from Home (WFH) or hybrid (WFH and Work from Office) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been known to remain until the end of the pandemic. In spite of that, the implementation of WFH or Hybrid is known to have an impact on interfering with the team functionality that works virtually at the company. Therefore, there needs to be an effort to increase the virtual team’s collective efficacy (VTCE) when collaborating virtually. One of the antecedents that could increase the VTCE is Paradoxical Leadership Behavior (PLB), a leadership style that could combine two competing behaviors into one new behavior, in this case combining the roles of agentic and communal leadership as a whole. Additionally, the Perceived Organizational Support (POS) is an employee’s perception of the organization's effort in increasing welfare and providing support at work are also antecedents from VTCE. Both antecedents are required to be further examined by utilizing vignette experiment 2 (high vs low PLB) x 2 (high vs low POS) between-subject design on 256 employees conducting WFH or hybrid. Utilizing 2 x 2 ANOVA Factorial, a significant effect was revealed from PLB and POS on VTCE. The implication of this research showed that there needs to be an implementation of PLB and post-pandemic organization support to increase the VTCE for the team when conducting WFH or hybrid.

Full Text:

References

Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952

Am, J. B., Furstenthal, L., Jorge, F., & Roth, E. (2021). Innovation in a crisis: Why it is more critical than ever. Mckinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/innovation-in-a-crisis-why-it-is-more-critical-than-ever

American Psychological Association. (2020, March 20). How leaders can maximize trust and minimize stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.apa.org/news/apa/2020/covid-19-leadership

Asgari, A., Mezginejad, S., & Taherpour, F. (2020). The role of leadership styles in organizational citizenship behavior through the mediation of perceived organizational support and job satisfaction. Innovar, 30(75), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n75.83259

Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental vignette studies n survey research. Methodology, 6(3), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000014

Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics, 9(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189

Baker, D. F. (2001). The Development of Collective Efficacy in Small Task Groups. Small Group Research, 32(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200404

Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mind Garden.

Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of r WG and r WG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006

Borgogni, L., Russo, S. Dello, & Latham, G. P. (2011). The relationship of employee perceptions of the immediate supervisor and top management with collective efficacy. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051810379799

Brown, S. G., Hill, N. S., & Lorinkova, N. (Nataly) M. (2021). Leadership and virtual team performance: A meta-analytic investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(5), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1914719

Capaldo, G., Capone, V., Babiak, J., Bajcar, B., & Kuchta, D. (2021). Efficacy beliefs, empowering leadership and project success in public research centers: An italian–polish study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136763

Chen, Y., Zhou, X., & Klyver, K. (2019). Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3847-9

Chou, H. W., Lin, Y. H., Chang, H. H., & Chuang, W. W. (2013). Transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of cognitive trust and collective efficacy. SAGE Open, 3(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497027

Elms, A. K., Gill, H., & Gonzalez-Morales, M. G. (2023). Confidence Is Key: Collective Efficacy, Team Processes, and Team Effectiveness. Small Group Research, 54(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964221104218

Errichiello, L., & Pianese, T. (2021). The Role of Organizational Support in Effective Remote Work Implementation in the Post-COVID Era (pp. 221–242). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6754-8.ch013

Franken, E., Plimmer, G., & Malinen, S. (2020). Paradoxical leadership in public sector organisations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12396

Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12344

Ganesh, M. P., & Gupta, M. (2010). Impact of virtualness and task interdependence on extra‐role performance in software development teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 16(3/4), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011053250

Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual Teams in Times of Pandemic: Factors That Influence Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637

Getachew, D. S., & Zhou, E. (2018). The Influences Of Transformational Leadership On Collective Efficacy: The Moderating Role Of Perceived Organizational Support. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 10(4), 7–15.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete SPSS 25 ((9th ed.)). Universitas Diponegoro.

Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. In Journal of Management (Vol. 41, Issue 5, pp. 1313–1337). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946

Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819

Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Davison, R. M. (2007). I know i can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406297041

Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Valacich, J. S. (2006). Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate. Small Group Research, 37(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405284219

Hastika, D. V. P., Hidayati, D. S., & Syakarofath, N. A. (2022). Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Efikasi Kolektif Karyawan Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Psychopolytan : Jurnal Psikologi, 5(2), 99–106.

Huh, Y., Reigeluth, C. M., & Lee, D. (2014). Collective Efficacy and its Relationship with Leadership in a Computer-mediated Project-based Group Work. In CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (Vol. 5, Issue 1).

International Labour Organization. (2020). Hasil penelitian Ringkasan eksekutif.

Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80

Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/10496402033003002

Kennedy, F. A., Loughry, M. L., Klammer, T. P., & Beyerlein, M. M. (2009). Effects of organizational support on potency in work teams: The mediating role of team processes. Small Group Research, 40(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408326744

Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.

Klonek, F. E., Gerpott, F. H., & Parker, S. K. (2020). A conceptual replication of ambidextrous leadership theory: An experimental approach. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101473

Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., … Wilmot, M. P. (2020). COVID-19 and the Workplace: Implications, Issues, and Insights for Future Research and Action Mark van Vugt.

Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners (4th ed.). SAGE.

Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554

Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective: Sharpening the Focus and Widening the Scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314522322

Lin, C. P., Wang, C. C., Chen, S. C., & Chen, J. Y. (2019). Modeling leadership and team performance: The mediation of collective efficacy and the moderation of team justice. Personnel Review, 48(2), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2017-0313

Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation Performance in New Product Development Teams in China’s Technology Ventures: The Role of Behavioral Integration Dimensions and Collective Efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12177

Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., Meaney, M., & Robinson, O. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. www.mckinsey.com/mgi.

Ma, Z., Long, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Lam, C. K. (2017). Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9508-1

McLarnon, M. J. W., & Woodley, H. J. R. (2021). Collective efficacy in virtual teams: Emergence, trajectory, and effectiveness implications. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 53(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000233

Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5

Novotney, A. (2021, April 1). Preparing for leadership in a pandemic workforce. Monitor on Psychology.

O’Neill, T. A. (2017). An overview of interrater agreement on likert scales for researchers and practitioners. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 8, Issue MAY). Frontiers Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00777

Osca, A., Urien, B., González-Camino, G., Martínez-Pérez, M. D., & Martínez-Pérez, N. (2005). Organisational support and group efficacy: A longitudinal study of main and buffer effects. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3–4), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510589064

Park, Y., Lim, D. H., Kim, W., & Kang, H. (2020). Organizational support and adaptive performance: The revolving structural relationships between job crafting, work engagement, and adaptive performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124872

Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics, 6(2), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172

Rachmawati, R., Choirunnisa, U., Pambagyo, Z. A., Syarafina, Y. A., & Ghiffari, R. A. (2021). Work from home and the use of ict during the covid-19 pandemic in indonesia and its impact on cities in the future. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126760

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.48

Salanova, M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., & Nielsen, K. (2022). The impact of group efficacy beliefs and transformational leadership on followers’ self-efficacy: a multilevel-longitudinal study. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2024–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00722-3

Shareen, P., & Shahid, M. (2020). Work from home during COVID-19: Employee perception and experiences. GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS, 9(5), 1–3.

Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX: A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958

Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015659

Sudha, K. S., Shahnawaz, M. G., & Farhat, A. (2016). Leadership Styles, Leader’s Effectiveness and Well-being: Exploring Collective Efficacy as a Mediator. Vision, 20(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916637260

Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill.

van Dam, K. (2009). Employee adaptability to change at work: A multidimensional, resource-based framework. In The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee’s Perspective (pp. 123–142). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096690.009

Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0070

Wilson, J. M., Lee, J., Fitzgerald, H. N., Oosterhoff, B., Sevi, B., & Shook, N. J. (2020). Job insecurity and financial concern during the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with worse mental health. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(9), 686–691. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001962

Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.