1. Home
  2. Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
  3. M Zaim

PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessments: How do they differ?

  • Abstract Views: 864
  • PDF Downloads: 16
  • December 1, 2021
  • M Zaim Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang,  Indonesia
  • Refnaldi Refnaldi Universitas Negeri Padang,  Indonesia
  • Yetti Zainil Universitas Negeri Padang,  Indonesia
  • Fiona Ramadhani Universitas Negeri Padang,  Indonesia
Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/00466za0002

Keywords:

Reading Literacy, assessment, PISA, senior high school

Abstract

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an international program assessment to evaluate and determine the education system's effectiveness by focusing on reading, mathematics, and science. This study aims to analyze the differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessment in West Sumatera. Reading literacy is abilities and skills in reading needed in everyday life to develop students' knowledge and potential. The method of this study was comparative method. Data were taken from PISA reading literacy 2018, which OECD published, and reading tests made by English teachers from ten Senior High Schools in West Sumatera. In addition, this study used document analysis to collect the data. The differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and reading literacy assessment at senior high school were seen from eight indicators: cognitive process, form of text, types of text, form of test, situation, types of question, level of question, text medium, and text environment. It was found that PISA reading literacy assessment was more complex compared to reading literacy assessment at senior high school.

Full Text:

References

Alderson, C. (2000). Assessing Reading. London: Cambridge University Press

Anderson, L.W. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Breakspear. (2014). How does PISA shape education policy-making? How we measure learning determines what counts in education, Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 240, November 2014.

Chamisah, C. (2016). TIMMS And PISA -How they help the improvement of education assessment in Indonesia. Conference Proceedings – ARICIS, 42-56.

Daeli, N.H., Hutapea, Y.J.N., Gea, F.D.N, Leastari, I., & Saragih, E. (2020). Identifying reading comprehension questions of national examination for senior high school students. Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 8(1), 83-90

Djiwandono, S. (2011). Tes bahasa: Pegangan bagi pengajar bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Fitria, E., Syarif, H., & Refnaldi. (2014). An analysis of reading comprehension questions in textbooks “English Texts in Use and Look Ahead” for senior high school grade X. Journal English Language Teaching, 2 (2), 1-15.

Harju-Luukkainen, H., Vettenranta, J., Ouakrim-Soivio, N., & Bernelius, V. (2016). Differences between students’ PISA reading literacy scores and grading for mother tongue and literature at school: A geostatistical analysis of the Finnish PISA 2009 data. Education Inquiry, 7(4), 463-479, 29413. doi:10.3402/edui.v7.29413

Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik soal literasi membaca PISA. Litera, 17(1), 90-106.

Harsiati, T & Priyatni, E.T. (2018). The characteristics of literacy test items in PISA. Litera, 17 (1), 1-11.

Muayanah, M. (2014). Reading comprehension questions developed by English teachers of senior high schools in Surabaya. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora 7 (1), 20-44.

OECD/UNESCO-UIS 2. (2003). Programme for international student assessment and non-OECD assessment Countries. Paris: OECD

OECD. (2006). Framework programme for international students assessment. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework – key competencies in reading, mathematics, and science. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf

OECD. (2017). PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: reading, mathematics, and science. Paris: OECD

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 released field trial and main survey new reading items. Paris: OECD

OEDC. (2018a). PISA 2018 reading literacy framework. Paris: OECD

Prasetyo, H.E. (2017). Developing authentic assessment for reading competence. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 82 Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9)

Rachel, D. (2011). Reading literacy in PISA 2009: A guide for teachers. Dublin: Educational Research Centre

Safari. (2020). Students' perception of teacher guide on reading learning based on results of PISA 2018. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment. 3 (1), 33-41.

Shiel, G. (2006). The PISA assessment of reading literacy. The Irish Journal of Education, 37, 79-100

Zaim, M., Zainil, Y, and Fitrawati. (2021). Reading assesssment to enhance critical thinking, argumentative thinking, and higher order thinking skills in junior high school. Proceeding International Conference on Languages and Arts, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang

Zaim, M., Refnaldi., Zainil, Y., & Irsyad, S.F. (2021). The implementation of authentic assessment for assessing students’ reading skills at senior high school. Proceeding of The 67th TEFLIN International Conference.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.