1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 2 (2019)
  3. Zulmiyetri Zulmiyetri

Improving Reading Fluency Through Videoscribe For Student with Learning Disability

  • Abstract Views: 928
  • PDF Downloads: 57
  • January 21, 2019
Corresponding Author

Keywords:

reading fluently; learning disability; Videoscribe

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of videoscribe for improving reading fluently ability for student with learning disability. This research uses single subject research (SSR) experiment, A-B-A design and data analysis technique using visual graph analysis. The subject of this research is student with learning disability. Target behavior in this study is the speed of reading fluently in short discourse text. Observations were conducted in three sessions. First is baseline session (A1), second, interventions through media videoscribe (B) and last session baseline (A2). Based on the results of research, we knew that the ability of children in reading fluently can be increased through videoscribe. At the baseline condition (A1), the reading fluently ability of the student increases from the duration of four point five minutes to four minutes. In intervention condition (B), the duration becomes shorter in one minute. At the baseline condition (A2) the duration becomes shorter, even without any intervention. Based on data analysis, it can be explained that direction tendency, stability tendency, data trending trend, and level change increase positively, and overlape percentage on inter-condition analysis is 0%. It can be concluded that the media videoscribe can improve reading fluently ability for student with learning disability.

Full Text:

References

Abbas, S. (2006). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Yang efektif di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Abdurrahman, M. (2003). Pendidian Anak Kesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Air, J., Oakland, E., & Walters, C. (2014). The Secrets Behind The rise Of Video Scribing. Bristol: Sparkol Books.

Air, J., Oakland, E., & Walters, C. (2015). How to design Your Own Whiteboard Animation. Bristol: Sparkol Books.

Allington, R. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers? Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.

Audain, J. (2014). The Ultimate Guide to using ICT Across The Curriculum. London: Bloomsburry Education.

Chard, D., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.-J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 386–406.

Dukes, C., & Ming, K. (2008). Fluency : A Necessary Ingredient in Comprehensive Reading Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms Fluency : A Necessary Ingredient in Comprehensive Reading Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 4(4), 2–14.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. JOurnal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.

Paris, S. . (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.

Pikulski, J. ., & Chard, D. . (2005). Fluency : Bridge Between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58, 510.

Rasinski, V. T., Rupley, W. ., Paige, D., & Nichols, D. . (2016). Alternative Text Types to Improve Reading Fluency for Competent to Struggling Readers. International Journal of Instruction, 9, 164.

Speece, D., & Ritchey, K. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 387–399.

Tindal, G., Nese, J. F. T., Stevens, J. J., & Alonzo, J. (2016). Growth on oral reading fluency measures as a function of special education and measurement sufficiency. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515590234

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.