1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 1 (2020)
  3. Winny Puspasari Thamrin

The Intention of Using Cell Phones In Digital Banking Service Base on External Factors and Internal Factors

  • Abstract Views: 455
  • PDF Downloads: 41
  • May 4, 2020
  • Winny Puspasari Thamrin Gunadarma university,  Indonesia
  • Kristiana Dewayani Gunadarma university,  Indonesia
  • Feny Fidyah Gunadarma university,  Indonesia
Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/00201za0002

Keywords:

Phone and Online Digital, Intention, Risk Perception, Self Efficacy and Locus of Control.

Abstract

The growing of digital services in the world of banking and the use of cellular telephones by customers, banks provide services in the form of phone and SMS banking that makes it easier for customers to transaction. The existence of digital banking makes it easy and saves time in making transactions. The purpose of this study was to examine the intention of using cell phones in digital banking services base on external factors (easiness, benefit, trust and risk) and internal factors (self efficacy and locus of control). This research model is prepared based on the concept of risk perception and behavior. Respondents in this study were 98 respondents that consist of students and employees. The sampling technique is non-random sampling. SEM model analysis techniques (structural equation model) with the help of the Lisrell 8.7 program. The results of this study indicate that the data obtained in accordance with the proposed model for both internal and external factors influence the intention of using cell phones for digital banking services.

Full Text:

References

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Ajzen, I. And Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy – the exercise of control (fifth printing, 2002). New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.

Bandura, A.(1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. New York: Academic Press.

Bhatti, T. (2007). Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. Vol. 12. pp. 1 – 13.

Costante, E., den Hartog, J. I., & Petkovich, M. (2011). Online trust perception: what really matters. Proceedings of the first workshop on socio-technical aspect in security and trust. Eidhoven University of Technology.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. Vol. 13 No. 3. pp. 319 – 339.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 8.

Featherman, M., and Pavlou P. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Inj. DeGross (ed.), proceedings of the eighth americas conference on information systems. New York: ACM.

Jerusalem. M & Mittag, W. (1995) Self-efficacy in stressful life transitions. Self efficacy in Changing Societies. A. Bandura (Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kreitner. R and Angelo. K. (2005). Orgaizational Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Luthan, F., Youssef, C.M., & Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. NY: Oxford University Pres.

Marakarkandy, B., Yajnik, N., & Dasgupta, C. (2017). Enabling Internet Banking Adoption: An Empirical Examination With An Augmented Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(2). 263-294.

McKnight, D. H., & N. L. Chervany. (2001). What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationship: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology. Journal of Electronic E-Commerce. 6, 2, 35-60.

Robbins. S. P. and Timothy A. Judge. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi Edisi ke-12, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rotter, J.B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: a case history of a variable. American Psychologist. Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 489 – 493.

Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs. Vol. 80. pp. 1 – 28.

Sanjaya, S.I.P. (2005). Pengaruh Rasa Manfaat dan Kemudahan Terhadap Minat Berperilaku. Kinerja. Vol 9 No.2. Hal. 113-122.

Surendran, P. (2012). Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume ‐2, No.‐4.

Taylor, S & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research. Vol. 6 No. 2. pp. 144 – 175.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 342–365.

Venkatesh, V., Morris et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. Vol. 27 No. 3. pp. 425 – 478.

Venkatesh, V. dan H. Bala. (2008). “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.” Decision sciences, 39(2), May. 273- 315.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.