1. Home
  2. Vol 1, No 1 (2017)
  3. Riren Rostari

LKPD Development On MEAs Based-Approach to Improve the Mathematical Representation Ability of Grade X Students

  • Abstract Views: 533
  • PDF Downloads: 73
  • March 29, 2018
Corresponding Author

Keywords:

MEAs, LKPD, Representation abylity, Plomp.

Abstract

LKPD used in school had not been optimal in helping students to improve the mathematical representation ability. It happened because the used LKPD was giving a less opportunity to the students to solve the mathematical representation problems. One of the solutions to do about that problem is to develop LKPD-Modeling Eliciting Activities (MEAs) based approach. The purpose of this study is to produce a valid, practical and effective LKPD-MEAs based approach to improve the students’ mathematical representation. This study is a development research using Plomp model which consists of Preliminary Research, Development or Prototyping and Assessment Phase. The subjects of this study were X grade students of SMAN 3 Padang. The instruments used were LKPD validation sheets, teacher’s response questionnaires, students’ response questionnaires and test. The result of this study is a valid, practical and effective LKPD-MEAs based approach with an average of each is 0,728,  85,39 and 82,41.

Full Text:

References

Amri. 2009. Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Induktif-Deduktif. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana UPI.

Besterfield, M. et al. 2010. Model Eliciting Activities: Assessing Engineering Student Problem Solving and Skill Integration Processes. International Journal Enginering Education Vol.26, no.4, pp.831-845. University of Pittsburgh.

Daharnis, D., & Ardi, Z. (2016). The Compatibility Student Choice of University Majoring; a Preliminary Studies. GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(1), 101-109.

Eric, M. 2008. “Using Model Eliciting Activities For Primary Mathematics Classrooms”. International Journal of The Mathematics Educator, Vol. 11, No.1/2, 47- 66. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Hanifah (2015).Penerapan Pembelajaran Meas Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik. Skipsi tidak diterbitkan. Jawa Barat: FKIP UNSIKA.

Hudiono, B. (2005). Peran Pembelajaran Diskursus Multi Representasi terhadap Pengembangan Kemampuan Matematik dan Daya Representasi pada Peserta didik SLTP.Disertasi pada PPS UPI.

Lesh, Richard, and Doerr, Helen M. 2003. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. 2012. TIMSS 2011 Internastional Result inMathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, BostonCollege.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Curriculum and evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Neria, D. & Amit, M. 2004. Students Preference of Non-Algebraic Representation in Mathematical Communication.Dalam T. Nakahara & M. Koyama. (Eds). Proseeding of the 28thConferenceof the International Group for the Psychology ofMathematicsEducation [Online],Vol.3.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional 2016. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Permana, Y dan Sumarmo, U. (2007). Pengembangan Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Koneksi Matematik Peserta didik SMA Melalui Pembelajaran Model Eliciting Activities.Educationist.

Plomp, Tjeerd dan Neinke Nieveen. 2013. Educational Design Research, Part A: An Introduction. Enchede: SLO

Tusaddiah, Halimah. 2012. Peningkatan Kemampuan Koneksi dan Representasi Matematis Peserta didik SMA melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Mind Map.Thesis tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana UPI.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.